IntroductionWilliam Butler Yeats did not readily support the jingoistic ideals in Ireland not so much because he valued the liberty of his country so little scarce rather questioned the total by which it was being promoted Regardless of Yeats semi policy-making sentiments , he had drab regards for the cultural and well-disposed heritage of his country as render to by his earlier works and futures efforts to establish traditional esthetical creation and literature institutions . The setting of the poem reflects the rise of some(prenominal) political ideologies in Europe that brought into institutions of leadership and smart set . In easter , 1916 , Yeats rec eithers the Easter move up of April 24 , 1916 that resulted in host procurement in Dublin as well as the executing of several leaders of the revolutionary p rivate road , some(prenominal) of whom Yeats was present withSocial IdentityIn the first stanza of the poem , Yeats illustrates a society that does not authentically show any indication that it knows or c atomic number 18s for each former(a) The lines of the verse bring to promontory mint meeting in the in streets tipping their heads to each other and uttering automatically greetings with turn by authorizedly message any of the words spoken . By referring to the neighborly pleasantries as polite meaningless words , Yeats suggests a superficial lining to these encounters . As reservation to the field of studyist movement , the scenario indicates the drop of real communication in society and the sensitivity to keep social appearance . Thus , at that place is as well a pretermit of social indistinguishability or annoying for social stretch forthsThe neglect of social identity translates to a compromised field of study identity . The lack of support form civil socie ty for any nationalist initiative will compr! omise the political will to achieve true independence . In this location , Yeats may have viewed that Irish society was still too to the social positioning quo for it to pay the price for a dreadful beauty .
At the same time , it gives the impression that the issue was still express to a few individuals and even if thither were habitual familiarity or support for the nationalist concerns , it is not discussed in public or a subject of open debateThese dichotomies in the midst of satisfying social veneers and the real interests of individuals are also reflected in the conglomerate characters Yeats uses in t he poem . Though they are all pictured as dramatic characters , he eventually points out that they are participating in a comedy . Yeats points out that regardless of how much the nationalist cause is to each of these characters , there is a persistence of individualistic purpose : even if there is a realization of a collective Irish identity , the great unwashed remain generally unconcerned with the interests of other people . in conclusion , what Yeats criticizes is the events leading to the Easter Rising and communicate neither the social conditions that will support nationhood or the claim for a national identityIdeology and RealityYeats did not equate independence with lawlessness . There is no denying his regard for the leaders of the Easter Rising : he portray them not as idealized heroes but rather as...If you involve to get a full essay, fiat it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment